10 HER (10 Herculis). Just over the border from Serpens Caput, the Head of the Serpent, and
five degrees north-northwest of Beta
Herculis (the luminary of Hercules, who
needs no introduction), 10 Herculis shines at a fairly dim 5th
(nominally 5.70) magnitude. Alpha
Herculis, in Hercules' head, is actually the fifth brightest in
the constellation, showing that Bayer also
had position in mind when in 1603 he lettered the stars. 10 Herculis
was too dim for anyone at the time to take note of; the number comes
from the later work of Flamsteed. But we digress. As
a cool (3455 Kelvin) class M (M4.5) giant, the star is readily
noticeable in binoculars by its reddish color. While 10 Her at first
was classed to be an irregular variable that wanders between magnitudes
5.58 and 5.83 (which gives it the variable star name LQ Herculis),
there seems to be an uncertain (and probably variable) period of around
27 days. From a distance of 682 light years (give or take 44) and after
factoring in a lot of infrared
radiation, the star is seen to shine with a luminosity of 1750 times
that of the Sun. In spite of the distance,
dimming by interstellar dust does
not seem to be a problem. Luminosity and temperature then conspire
to give a radius 117 times solar, 0.54 Astronomical Units, or 1.4 times
the radius of Mercury's orbit. Interferometric measures of the
angular diameter coupled with distance give 130 solar radii, 11 percent
greater. The difference is not all that surprising, since for cool,
large red giants stars like this one, a "surface" is hard to define,
as such stars have rather fuzzy boundaries and the radius depends on
the wavelength of observation and on the presence of absorption
features within the observed wavelength band, particularly those of
titanium oxide. Moreover, variability in brightness implies change
in radius, so the timing of observation becomes a significant factor.
Given such problems, the agreement between the two values of radius
is actually rather good. Given its coolness, 10 Herculis is probably
brightening as a red giant for the second time, now with a dead
carbon/oxygen core, the result of helium fusion (the first time was
with a dead helium core, the result of hydrogen fusion), and may be
on its way to becoming a long-period
variable like Mira. The theory of stellar
structure and evolution suggests a star with a mass of around 1.5 times
that of the Sun or perhaps a bit greater, but it's hard to tell as stars
in this state over a wide range of mass have similar parameters. There
seems to be no companion to watch the star lose its outer envelope and
generate a planetary nebula from the expanding leavings and exposed
hot core, which will then turn into a white dwarf with a mass
around 60 percent that of the Sun.
Written byJim Kaler 7/31/15. Return to STARS.