GAMMA CRT (Gamma Crateris), one confused star. It's not really
that the star is confused, though; it's more that WE are confused
about IT. Another fourth magnitude (4.08) class A (A5) hydrogen-
fusing dwarf in what is arguably the dimmest of ancient
constellations, Crater (the Cup), is not
going to get a lot of attention (just 75 references to it over the
past 150 years), which is reflected by what is "known" about it.
Class assignments span the full range of the A stars, running from
as hot as A0 to as cool as A9! The star's color suggests more like
A7. We'll stick with the nominal A5. Temperature measures are
equally askew, and range from a low of 7750 Kelvin to a high of
10,700 K. Given that an A5 star should have a temperature of 8700
K, we adopt the average of 9000 Kelvin. Stars like this one do not
vary significantly, so the problem rests with observation. At
least the distance of 82 light years (good to better than a light
year) is secure. And at least the temperature uncertainty plays
but a small role in estimating the amount of ultraviolet radiation
from the star. Given these parameters, Gamma Crt radiates a dozen
Sun's-worth of light into space, yielding a
radius of 1.5 times that of the Sun. A solidly-known (and rather
high) projected equatorial rotation speed of 138 kilometers per
second (apparently enough to keep the stellar atmosphere
sufficiently stirred to prevent odd chemistry through separation of
elements) yields a rotation period under 0.6 days. Theory
subsequently gives a mass of 1.9 solar and suggests relative youth
for a star with hydrogen-fusion lifetime of about two billion
years. Adoption of a lower temperature of 8000 K (which slightly
diminishes the amount of ultraviolet light) does not make much
difference, dropping the mass to 1.75 Suns. As might by now be
expected for Gamma Crt, it's not clear if the star has a dusty disk
or not, some authorities saying yes, others no.
And it's also no surprise that the confusion extends to Gamma Crt's
binary companion, Gamma B,
which from the run of past observations should now be about 6
seconds of arc from Gamma A. In the 19th century, Smythe and
Chambers called the pair "fine but delicate," ... "bright white and
grey." Herschel, who discovered the duplicity, said the companion
was "utterly obnubilated under the slightest artificial light."
(Obnubilated? "To cloud, or obscure.") Magnitude estimates and
measures range from as bright at 7.9 to as faint as 11. Going with
a listed value of magnitude 9.6 makes the companion a warm-side
class K dwarf with a mass of perhaps 0.8 Suns. A physical
separation of at least 150 Astronomical Units (which, given the
likely foreshortening, might be a lot bigger) leads from Kepler's
laws to a period of at least 1150 years. So the bottom line
seems to be that nobody really knows the class, the temperature,
whether the star has a surrounding disk, or the magnitude of the
companion. At least we get to use the word "obnubilated," which
describes not just the companion, but the entire system!
Written by Jim Kaler 4/15/11. Return to STARS.